|
FinishLynx
Cycling Gallery
 |
I'll
start this page off with a Pinkerton Special (left).
Taken at the third stage of the Birmingham 2-Day
in 2002, it shows one of the riders crashing over
the line. Still, at least he finished and was
considerate enough to turn and show his number
for the benefit of the camera.
|
|
The image on the right was taken
at a Ladies National Series event in Surrey. Two
possible solutions:-
- Add
a pair of scissors to our toolkit.
- Press
BC to come up with a standard safety helmet incorporating
a hairnet.
This
is quite a common problem in women's racing, and
makes the job of a photofinish operator VERY difficult.
|
 |
 |
This
Dutch rider (left) at Halesowen during
2005 has
pulled his foot off the pedal and it shows up
very clearly here.
Most
of us can remember toe clips and straps (Bob still
has them), and in my opinion they should have
remained the norm for all track racing.
|
|
What
a great Eastway pic from Knocker. Jez McCann (Team
Darenth) crashed
with 70 metres to go and had his number torn off.
|
 |
| Mum
then realized he had no race number on. She then chased
after Jez, caught him on the line and held out his
race number so he could claim his 3rd place. What
a pair of stars! |
Here's
another star from the 2006 ToB (right).
We
are quick (quite rightly) to criticise riders
for not displaying a number which we can read.
Well, at the stage finish in Sheffield this rider
came through holding his number to face the camera.
It's
a lot clearer on the original full sized image,
but you get the gist of it here. The Commissaire
President went to thank the rider concerned at
the start next day.
|
 |
 |
The
things riders do when they think nobody's watching.
Sean Brennan (left) in another pic from
Bob at the Tour of the South.
|
Now
then, here's a tale of two evening races a fortnight
apart. I went to Clitheroe in early August 2006.
Before the racing it rained hard and we couldn't
get a white line down. During the evening the weather
cleared and the pictures were great. With 3 laps of the main event
to go I was still getting a good image
|
 |
so
didn't bother switching on my 12v lights (there
was no genny for the mains lights). This was a BAD
mistake.
In those last 5 minutes the light went almost completely,
and the picture (above) shows the result.
I wasn't too concerned because I could still read
ALL the numbers. However, the strange thing is that
the leading edges of almost all the front wheels,
and the trailing edges of the back wheels were lost
when I auto-cropped the picture. There was nothing
too controversial so I didn't restore the cropped
areas. My guess was that because we had dark tyres
on a dark road with very little light, Lynx
found it hard to detect movement and so the cropping
went a little haywire. Incidentally,
note the press photographer's flash in the middle
of the picture.
Roger
was kind enough to let me have the technical reason:-
"To
help auto-crop work well there has to be a tolerance
on the pixel change otherwise any small changes
would cause the auto-cropping procedure to
leave most of the image intact. Auto-crop looks
at each column of pixels and decides if anything
has changed or not, if all is the same as the
previous column then nothing is happening, but
when there is a change that means a target athlete
(or an official) has passed through the camera
Auto-crop takes out the "same" columns
and leaves the changing columns. There is always
some change in each pixel column so the system
has a tolerance built-in so that small changes
do not effect the operation. However, if the image
is very murky you may be on the auto-crop threshold
of working or not working well, i.e. if you have
a dark background and foreground situation with
low light then auto-crop may not work and you
should use manual cropping."
There,
I was right all along - I think!
|
 |
Two
weeks later I was at Rochdale, and the weather
was great. I wasn't going to get caught out again
so I went for overkill and switched on all the
lights (2 x 500W mains floodlights plus 2 x 12v
lights).
Good
job I did because the rain started halfway through
the main event and it went really dark. The resulting
Lynx image is shown (left).
|
Our
job is made harder when riders don't position their
numbers for the camera to see them. The following
series of images from Bob were taken early season
when he was running some camera tests before his
first event proper of 2007. Just how do they expect
to be placed in cases like this? Not only that,
but it's unfair on race organisers who pay good
money for the service. |
 |
This
pic (left) from the final stage of the
Bikeline 2 Day in North Wales had us stumped for
a long time.
We
were trying to identify the rider on the far side
in this clip from the middle of the bunch who
was obscured by number 22. But believe it or not,
number 22 IS the rider on the far side, and the
guy nearest the camera had his number covered
by a top.
It only came
to light when we asked the riders to look at the picture, and
even now I think I was dreaming!
|
An
interesting pic from Knocker (right) which
returns us to the subject of filming in the dark.
He
struggled with this race and had a hard time setting
the focus as he was very near the edge of the circuit
and could not get high enough.
With
no floodlights, he's done well to be able to pick
out the numbers. |
 |
 |
We
don't see much tandem racing these days so it's
nice to be able to include a picture here taken
at Newcastle under Lyne track. In fact it's the
National tandem championship.
Nothing
particularly remarkable but it looks good, and Bob
always seems to achieve better colours than me! |
We
always seem to be complaining about riders not displaying
their number for the benefit of our cameras. However,
Bob spotted this (right) at the Junior
Tour of Worcestershire.
Rider
number 38 went through the finish in the broom wagon and his
race number is still clearly visible. He should get some sort
of award, surely! |
 |
What a cracking
Lynx image from Bob, taken at the Newport Nocturne at around 10-15pm. It was very
dark but look at the sprint for 4th/5th place...sort that out by hand in the dark. The riders had frame numbers which even showed up in Bob's original full-size picture.
How did the old fella do it? We'll miss him.
 |
It's nice to get a picture from Scotland, and here's a good one from Bill.
A close finish to the Elite/1/2 Crit at Dumfries in May. Bill called it a Halfords sandwich.
Thanks Bill, let us see some more. |
This great clip from the film of the International CiCle Classic highlights what we mean when we say that the more numbers on display, the better.
Riders were issued with body, and frame numbers and both show clearly on number 88 nearest the camera.
However the rider behind him has his body number obscured by number 88's head! Fortunately his frame number can just be picked out (it's 173)!
Thanks John.
 |
I just love this one (left). Bill took it at the Backpool weekend in 2008.
He says that one of the riders' teammates had identical numbers!
Two numptys for the price of one, eh? |
4th cat race at Victoria Park in Birmingham. Nice close finish with a little bit extra if you look closely.
Numbers 56 and 48 contest a really tight spriny for 1st and 2nd places, but there is another rider just obscured by them who has crashed and you can see his back wheel flying through the air on it's side.
John tells me that the rider at the top of the picture also crashed and he wondered how the two leaders stayed upright.
Thanks John.
No, this picture hasn't been doctored in Photoshop!
It's come courtesy of Jeff Davis from the Alberta Bicycle Association in Canada where until recently they used the black and white version of FinishLynx camera. It's a lovely crystal clear image and a little bit different to our normal pics. Jeff gave me permission to include it here.
If you look closely you will see that the rider nearest the camera lost the sprint but had lifted his back wheel off the ground on the line. Stands to reason that if you take your driving wheel off the road you will lose a bit of momentum.
Interesting Lynx image from John Pearson from a race at Halesowen. Both the riders above seem to be wearing identical number 14s.
|